The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC



League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Bromley46+2587
2MK Dons46+4186
3Cambridge Utd46+3382

4Salford46+1081
5Notts County46+2280
6Chesterfield46+1579
7Grimsby46+2478

8Barnet46+1776
9Swindon46+1175
10Oldham46+1668
11Crewe46+667
12Colchester46+1366
13Walsall46065
14Bristol Rovers46-962
15Fleetwood Town46-161
16Accrington Stanley46-1153
17Gillingham46-1953
18Cheltenham46-2652
19Shrewsbury46-2749
20Newport County46-2943
21Tranmere46-2541
22Crawley Town46-2440

23Harrogate Town46-2939
24Barrow46-3336

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

Follow the Fishy on Twitter
NewsNow logo

Question of the Week

Continent 2026 World Cup winners?








His Honour
His Honour

Don't Hold Your Breath Waiting For The Cash!

By: Bill Osborne
Date: 13/06/2005

IN the club statement regarding the legal action against the Hammonds solicitors group, the club issues a warning that we should not get carried away by the announcement as litigation can go either way.

One can be assured that the legal representatives of the insurance companies of Hammonds will try every trick in the book to defend their clients, as it is the insurance company or companies that will eventually pay out if the League wins.

One of the main issues to be resolved is the question of liability of the contract acceptance.

The defence will plead, according to the advice I have been given that: "The solicitors only offered advice and it was up to the League to either accept or not the advice given. The League decided to accept the advice and acted upon it. In short, the League signed the contract which was the cause of the financial losses sustained by the clubs due to no guarantees being obtained from the parent companies of ITV Digital. Therefore the League are responsible, not the solicitors."

Now that seems straight enough to me but fortunately or unfortunately, as the case may be, the law is much more complicated than that and it is not as clear cut as it appears.

In any case, we may not see any decision before we pay the outstanding tax bill, so that is another reason we should not get carried away.

I personally have been through the courts in a compensation case and my view is that if during the course of events an out of court settlement is offered, providing the offer is reasonable, the League should accept it rather than risking losing the whole lot.

Better to have half a loaf than none at all.

Mind you, if the case collapses and we get nothing, we can always sue the League for failing to protect us. Didn't one club suggest doing that just after the ITV Digital collapse?

Whatever happens, the Football League has learned a very expensive lesson.

Always read the small print before you sign! Everybody knows that.

Except the Football League perhaps.

Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories


Forum Latest
Thread TitlePostsLatest Post
Lukeos Seat Count30Limerick Mariner08/06 23:19
Thursday 35AdamHaddock08/06 22:47
Evan Khouri78WOZOFGRIMSBY08/06 21:20
Turi/Kacurri5ska face08/06 20:27
Summer Transfer Rumour thread797GtfcGarner08/06 20:15
Karl Robinson43hampshiremariner08/06 15:14
Slovenia24gtfc_chris08/06 15:14
England v New Zealand43rancido08/06 14:27
Tyrekickers29Civvy at last08/06 07:58

This Season and previous Seasons