The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC

il flag

Israeli Premier League Form Table

Israeli Premier League Form (Last 10)
Pos Team P W D L F A GD PtsBTTS G15 km15
1Hapoel Ramat Gan10730209+1124800
2Ironi Tiberias10631178+921400
3Hapoel Be'er Sheva106222113+820500
4Beitar Jerusalem105411711+619600
5Hapoel Kiryat Shmona106131711+619400
6Maccabi Tel Aviv105232014+617600
7Maccabi Netanya105231918+117600
8Maccabi Haifa104151619-313500
9Hapoel Haifa102531012-211500
10Hapoel Tel Aviv10325912-311300
11Hapoel Jerusalem1032549-511100
12Maccabi Petah Tikva101721414010800
13Bnei Sakhnin10136316-136100
14Hapoel Petah Tikva10037721-143500

xPts is shown for both the 6 games and last 10 games.
For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Israeli Premier League (Expected Points)
PosTeamP6PtsxPtsPts v xPts P10PtsxPtsPts v xPts
1Ironi Tiberias616 1021 
2Hapoel Ramat Gan614 1024 
3Hapoel Be'er Sheva613 1020 
4Maccabi Haifa610 1013 
5Maccabi Netanya610 1017 
6Hapoel Kiryat Shmona610 1019 
7Hapoel Jerusalem610 1011 
8Hapoel Haifa69 1011 
9Beitar Jerusalem69 1019 
10Maccabi Tel Aviv68 1017 
11Maccabi Petah Tikva67 1010 
12Hapoel Tel Aviv65 1011 
13Hapoel Petah Tikva63 103 
14Bnei Sakhnin61 106 
Key to column names
  • P6/P10 - First column showing results grouped into either last 6 or last 10 games
  • Pts - Actual points earned during the last 6 or 10 games
  • xPts - Expected points from those games, based on aggregated xG (expected goals) for and against
  • Pts v xPts - Comparison of actual versus expected points (positive = over-performance; negative = under-performance)

For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Goals scored and conceded (Last 10)
Pos Team FAGDMG BTTS SF CF CS TF
1Hapoel Ramat Gan20911298/10 (80%)7/10 (70%)3/10 (30%)2/10 (20%)25
2Ironi Tiberias1789254/10 (40%)7/10 (70%)1/10 (10%)6/10 (60%)25
3Hapoel Be'er Sheva21138345/10 (50%)7/10 (70%)3/10 (30%)4/10 (40%)45
4Beitar Jerusalem17116286/10 (60%)4/10 (40%)5/10 (50%)3/10 (30%)38
5Hapoel Kiryat Shmona17116284/10 (40%)5/10 (50%)5/10 (50%)5/10 (50%)32
6Maccabi Tel Aviv20146346/10 (60%)8/10 (80%)2/10 (20%)4/10 (40%)22
7Maccabi Netanya19181376/10 (60%)5/10 (50%)4/10 (40%)3/10 (30%)25
8Maccabi Haifa1619-3355/10 (50%)3/10 (30%)7/10 (70%)1/10 (10%)29
9Hapoel Haifa1012-2225/10 (50%)4/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)4/10 (40%)31
10Hapoel Tel Aviv912-3213/10 (30%)6/10 (60%)4/10 (40%)3/10 (30%)46
11Hapoel Jerusalem49-5131/10 (10%)3/10 (30%)5/10 (50%)5/10 (50%)41
12Maccabi Petah Tikva14140288/10 (80%)6/10 (60%)3/10 (30%)2/10 (20%)29
13Bnei Sakhnin316-13191/10 (10%)2/10 (20%)6/10 (60%)3/10 (30%)27
14Hapoel Petah Tikva721-14285/10 (50%)1/10 (10%)8/10 (80%)1/10 (10%)29
Key to column names
  • F - Goals "for" (scored)
  • A - Goals "against" (conceded)
  • GD - Goal difference (F - A)
  • MG - Match goals (F + A)

  • BTTS - Both Teams to Score (number of games, max 10)
  • SF - Team to Score First (number of games, max 10)
  • CF - Team to Concede First (number of games, max 10)

  • CS - Clean Sheets (number of games, max 10)
  • TF - Mean Time of First Goal (in minutes, by either side)

For column heading definitions, see the Key at the bottom of the table.

Numbers of Players (Last 10)
Pos TeamPts SP Pl SPG PM SM
1Hapoel Ramat Gan24     
2Ironi Tiberias212026   
3Hapoel Be'er Sheva2023283.46525
4Beitar Jerusalem1918243.47218
5Hapoel Kiryat Shmona1924322.96821
6Maccabi Tel Aviv1722243.96922
7Maccabi Netanya1726373.36525
8Maccabi Haifa1326333.96327
9Hapoel Haifa1125283.97119
10Hapoel Tel Aviv1124274.07023
11Hapoel Jerusalem112126   
12Maccabi Petah Tikva10     
13Bnei Sakhnin625322.56426
14Hapoel Petah Tikva32126   
Key to column names
  • Pts - Team points
  • SP - Total number of starting players used over last 10 games
  • Pl - Total number of players (starting + substitutes) used over last 10 games
  • SPG - Mean number of substitutes per game
  • PM - Median number of minutes played for substituted players
  • SM - Median number of minutes played for substitutes

The ELO rating for each team shows its relative strength based on past match results, adjusting dynamically after each game. A value for k of 50 has been used, meaning ratings change more significantly, making them more responsive to recent performance.

Team ELO Ratings
PosTeamELO Rating
ELO ratings are not available for this league

League Table for this division